How to Read FDD Item 19 (Financial Performance Representations)
Item 19 is optional, regulated, and the most-misread part of any FDD. A factual guide to what is actually being disclosed and what is not.
Published May 2, 2026 · 6 min read
Posts on FranchiseDiff are AI-assisted and human-reviewed. Every factual claim is verified against the source FDD or regulator document cited.
Of all 23 items in a Franchise Disclosure Document, Item 19 — Financial Performance Representations is the one prospective franchisees most want to read and most often misread. This post is a factual walkthrough of what Item 19 actually is, what the rules require, and what the absence or presence of an Item 19 does and doesn't tell you.
Item 19 is optional
Unlike the other 22 items, which the franchisor must complete, Item 19 is the only item where the franchisor has a choice: it may make a financial performance representation, or it may decline to. The FTC Franchise Rule at 16 CFR §436.5(s) is clear:
"You may elect to make a financial performance representation, but you are not required to do so."
If the franchisor does not make a representation, the FDD must say so explicitly with this prescribed disclosure (paraphrased here; see the rule for the exact language):
"We do not make any representations about a franchisee's future financial performance or the past financial performance of company-owned or franchised outlets. We also do not authorize our employees or representatives to make any such representations either orally or in writing."
That paragraph is the entire Item 19 in many FDDs.
Why brands omit Item 19
A franchisor that includes an Item 19 representation is bound by it: every statement must have a "reasonable basis" supported by written records that the franchisor must make available to prospective franchisees on request. False or unsubstantiated Item 19 disclosures expose the franchisor to FTC enforcement, state regulatory action, and private litigation by franchisees who relied on them.
That liability surface is real. Many franchisors choose not to make a representation rather than commit to documenting and standing behind specific numbers. The absence of an Item 19 is not, by itself, a red flag — and the presence of one is not, by itself, a green flag. Both choices have non-obvious tradeoffs.
What an Item 19 must include if it's there
When a franchisor does make a financial performance representation, the FTC Franchise Rule and the parallel NASAA 2017 Statement of Policy impose strict requirements:
- A factual basis — what units the data covers (which segment of the system, which time period, which fiscal year).
- A clear method of computation — average, median, or both; mean of unit sales, gross profit, EBITDA, or some other metric.
- The number of outlets included and excluded, and the reasons for any exclusions.
- The number and percentage of outlets that achieved or exceeded the represented figure.
- Material assumptions and conditions that affect the represented numbers.
- A cautionary statement that some outlets have earned the represented amount, but your individual results may differ; there is no assurance you will earn as much.
If subset data is presented (e.g., only top-quartile units or only units open for at least 24 months), the criteria for the subset and the size of the subset must be disclosed.
How to read an Item 19, step by step
When you encounter an Item 19 representation, work through it in this order:
1. Identify the cohort
What units are included? The most useful Item 19 covers all franchisee-operated units open for the full reporting period; less useful cohorts include only company-operated units, only top-performing units, or units selected without disclosed criteria. The cohort definition is usually the first paragraph.
2. Distinguish averages from medians
The mean of unit sales is the arithmetic average — sensitive to high-revenue outliers. The median is the middle value — half the units earn more, half earn less. A system with a few very strong units and many average units will show a mean substantially above the median. The 2017 NASAA Statement of Policy strongly encourages franchisors to disclose both, but does not always require it.
3. Find the "% above the average" figure
Item 19 typically states what percentage of units in the cohort achieved or exceeded the average figure. This is the single most useful sentence in the disclosure. If 40% of units achieved the average, the average is being pulled up by the top 60% — meaning the median is below the mean and the typical unit earns less than the headline number suggests.
4. Distinguish revenue from profit
Many Item 19 disclosures show gross sales only — not net profit, not unit-level EBITDA, not return on the franchisee's investment. A unit with $1.5M of gross sales can be highly profitable or not, depending on labor cost, rent, food cost, royalty, ad fund, debt service, and dozens of other variables. Item 19 sales figures need to be combined with the franchisee's own pro forma to estimate return on investment — which neither Item 19 nor any other part of the FDD does for you.
5. Note exclusions
Reasons units are typically excluded: open less than a full reporting period, closed during the period, located in a non-traditional venue (kiosk, food truck, airport), part of a multi-unit operator that does not separately report. Each exclusion is legitimate; the question is whether what remains is representative of the unit you intend to open.
6. Read the substantiation paragraph
Every Item 19 must close with a sentence telling you that substantiating data is available on reasonable request. If you are seriously considering buying, request that data and read it. Franchisors that decline a reasonable request are out of compliance with the rule.
What Item 19 does not tell you
Several common questions are not answered by Item 19, even a thorough one:
- What will my unit do? Item 19 reports system data; your unit's performance depends on your market, your operations, and conditions outside any current data set.
- What is the typical net profit? Item 19 most often reports revenue, not profit. Unit-economic outcomes require building a pro forma using Item 6 (royalty + ad fund), Item 7 (initial investment), local labor and rent, and your own assumptions.
- What is the failure rate? Item 20 (not Item 19) discloses outlet counts and changes — openings, closings, terminations, transfers — for the past three fiscal years. Combine the two.
Talk to existing franchisees
Item 20 lists every current franchisee in the system and recently-departed franchisees, with city and state. Existing franchisees are the single most useful source of unit-economic information about a franchise system, and the disclosure exists explicitly so you can call them. A serious purchase process includes calls with at least a dozen franchisees in markets comparable to yours.
Item 19 sets the context. Talking to franchisees fills in the parts the document cannot.
Sources
Related posts
What Is an FDD? A Plain-English Walkthrough of All 23 Items
A short, factual walkthrough of every item in a Franchise Disclosure Document, with the FTC Franchise Rule citations behind each one.
FDD Item 5 vs Item 7: Initial Fee vs Initial Investment
The two cost numbers in every FDD. A short, factual guide to what each one covers, why they aren't interchangeable, and how to read them together.
